The automated editorial QA pipeline built on 15 years of senior editorial judgment. Nothing like it exists on the market.
5+ articles fully processed in ~10 minutesThe draft comes out flat, stuffed, or robotic. A human editor fixes it at $25–80/hour and takes at least 30 minutes per article. At volume, that cost hollows out your margin faster than the AI savings justified the switch.
EditStack closes that gap automatically, on every article. You cannot do that with a Claude prompt.
If clients ask whether it's human or AI content,
you say: It's premium edits only.
The real cost is the bottleneck. The queue that forms when 40 articles need a QA pass and two editors have capacity for twelve.
EditStack has no queue. Submit 5 articles at 9am. Receive 5 publish-ready drafts by 9:10. The bottleneck disappears.
EditStack is the editorial QA pipeline that enterprise analogs will not match on price or precision for years.
EditStack is a multi-node editorial pipeline. Sequential automated passes run across every article you submit. No prompting required after setup.
EditStack was built by Brad Bergan, a senior editor with 15+ years across science, finance, culture, and technology. Bylines and editorial roles at Bloomberg, VICE, NBC News, Discover, and The World Economic Forum. Two published books through Quarto Group, including a #1 Amazon bestseller.
Most editorial AI tools are LLM wrappers built by engineers who have never edited at scale. EditStack was built by someone who has. That judgment is now encoded into infrastructure that runs automatically.
EditStack encodes the judgment that takes a decade to develop into infrastructure that runs in 10 minutes on every article you submit.
$500 post-pilot setup fee. Covers voice calibration, formatting standards, and SEO configuration for your client roster.
Pricing locks for the first three months. Early clients set the baseline before rates adjust for new subscribers.